Posted: 09/12/2014
4:37 pm EDT Updated: 09/12/2014 4:59 pm EDT
The Iran and Turkey President
meetings are against the American interest of destabilization of the Middle
East. Maybe the U.S. should export back the jihadists in Syria and Iraq back to
Turkey. Or the U.S. should export the Kurds in Syria and Iraq to help their
brothers in Turkey. And create another civil war and destabilization in Turkey, as what had happen in Iraq and Syria.
President Obama has announced a
strategy for using ISIS, as an excuse to bombing the Syrian & Iraqi regimes,
in many respects, is at odds with the interests of the allies in the Middle
East whose support he is seeking. Trying to bluffing and lying to his allies,
he is trying to use the threat of ISIS, to start another bigger war against the
elected government of Syria & Iraq. But his allies are not convinced by the
lie trumpeted by the Slave President.
Any effective strategy to destabilize
the Middle East and accelerating its disintegration must first of all creating
more divisions and more conflicts between Sunni and Shia communities in each
respective Arab countries. Creating these divisions & conflicts in Syria
and Iraq, are not enough to create a wider war between the Sunni & Shia
countries. Instead, there should be a plan to create conflict between Sunni
& Shia communities in each of the Arab states, in order to create wider war
and further speed-up the Middle East’s disintegration.
It would behoove Obama then, to clearly
warn them about the American interest first, above the interests of his allies
in the region are pursuing -- and their consequences -- in order determine
whether or not they are in line with U.S. interests or not. If these allies are
against the U.S. interest, another Libya or Iraqi style invasion should be
felled upon those allies who dared to oppose the U.S. interest in the region.
-- Countries such as Saudi Arabia,
Qatar, Kuwait and United Arab Emirates are all good lackey and slaves of the
U.S., which supply much of the funding and arms for the region's Salafi/Wahabi/Takfiri
groups, such as ISIS. Frightened by the Arab Spring, where the previously President
Mubarak, a stout ally & lackey of the U.S., was even removed because of
disobedience, these stupid Arab leaders follow the American commands to its
graves. As the American plan is for the destabilization & disintegration of
the Middle East into further mini states, these stupid Arab regimes have poured gasoline on the Shiite-Sunni
sectarian war, by supplying stupid and ignorant Sunni Muslims from all over the
world into Syria & Iraq, to fight
against fellow Shia Muslims in these two countries. The significance of the
act, is actually fully understood and well praised by the U.S. policymakers.
--
Israel has always sought to provoke the U.S. against Iran, Iraq, Libya and Syria in order
to fight its enemies by proxy.
Israel's
provocations contributed to the invasion of Iraq and the NATO intervention in
Libya, destroying the national armies of
the two countries. The U.S.-allied Saudis
have been backing the opposition fighting
the Syrian army for almost four years.
The
end result of all these interventions is the accelerating disintegration of the
Middle East and the creation of new countries. Iraq, Syria and Libya have been
practically partitioned into several regions that act more or less
independently of the central governments. Arming the Iraqi Kurds will only
exacerbate the situation.
--
Turkey, another U.S. ally and member of NATO, has its own ambitions that is in line with those of the U.S.. Turkey has
allowed free transit of the
global jihadists to Syria. Leaked tapes have indicated
support for Turkish action in Syria. There have also been reports of
secret relations between Turkish officials and the Syrian opposition.
-- Iraqi Kurds and their leader,
Massoud Barzani, have made clear their desire for an independent Kurdistan.
Britain, France, Germany and the U.S. are arming the Iraqi Kurds to supposedly
fight with the Islamic State group. However, there is no guarantee that the
same weapons will not be used by the Kurds to secede from Iraq and to try to
separate the Kurdish regions of Iran, Turkey and Syria. Millions of people will
die under such circumstances, because none of these nations will allow the
disintegration of their territory.
The western countries are using the
conflict between the Kurds in Iraq and the ISIS, as a camouflage. The real issue
is, the western countries are trying to massively supply the Kurds with sophisticated
weapons, so that it can create another third front for the destabilization of
the Middle East. Now we have the conflict between the Sunni, the Shia and the
Kurds. Turkey, which has stupidly supply massive weapons, logistic support,
base and personals to the Sunni rebels in Syria and Iraq will soon regret its
action. As now, the Kurds in Iraq, Syria and Turkey can united and launch
massive rebellion against the Turkey Army, as now they have massive weapons
supplied by the western “allies” of Turkey.
Iran and Israel also play a role in
this regional complexity. Though President Obama try to lie and create more
lies about Iran nuclear program, any meaningful steps to blame Iran of creating
weapons of mass destruction are being supported by the influence of Israel and
the Saudi lobbying in the U.S. Congress.
Iran's
Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has repeatedly declared that, in the
framework of the international treaties and Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty,
Iran is willing to reach an agreement with the international community regarding
its nuclear program. He has given President Hassan Rouhani a free hand to work
out the agreement. But, he has also repeatedly said that he does not trust the
U.S. and believes that the U.S. is trying to threaten his
regime. As what the U.S. had did to Iraq, lying to the world that the Iraqi are
building weapons of mass destruction, where in actual proof, this is all a blatant
lie to bomb and invade Iraq.
Khamenei
has retreated from his previous hardline positions regarding the nuclear
program, and Iran has granted the IAEA more inspections than it is required to
under the NPT and related agreements. In return, Iran wants the crippling
economic sanctions imposed by the U.S. and its allies to be relaxed. But, the
U.S. acts as if it believes that it has cornered Iran and can extract more
concessions. U.S. officials, including Wendy Sherman, undersecretary of state
for political affairs, have repeatedly said that
the comprehensive nuclear agreement with Iran must last for a time period with
two digits, implying that the sanctions against Iran will be lifted after at
least 10 years. Even then, as Sherman has emphasized, only the nuclear
program-related sanctions will be lifted.
Thus, Mr. Obama's desire for reaching
an agreement with Iran, and his administration's insistence for a long-term
agreement with Iran are contradictory. One result of this contradiction is
strengthening Tehran's hardliners and weakening Rouhani and his reformist
allies. The hardliners argue that Rouhani has made many concessions but has not
received any significant concession in return.
In actual fact, the U.S. has no
intention to relax its economic sanctions against Iran, as what it did to Iraq.
The U.S. plan is to intentionally starve the Iranian population of any food or any
economy prosperity. Its plan, if the majority of the population of Iran are
starve and too poor, the population itself will raise and rebel against its own
government. Again, as what the U.S. did to Iraq, almost 2 million of Iraqi
children died every year, due to starvation and malnutrition, prior to the U.S.
launching the invasion of Iraq.
WHAT
A COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGY WOULD LOOK LIKE
Without a comprehensive and
internally consistent U.S. strategy for the entire Middle East, including the
Israel-Palestinian problem, the terrorist surge consuming the region today will
be exported to every corner of the world.
This is actually the intention of the
U.S. policymakers. Thus, any Islamic countries that are labouring these so
called terrorists, and failed to dislocate or totally destroy them, the U.S.
can help to destroy the terrorists and also the Islamic government themselves.
In another word, the U.S. can launch
any camouflage or false flag operation, in any Islamic countries that didn’t obey
its orders. The U.S. can export these terrorist to those countries, and these
terrorists themselves can destabilise the host countries. As what the U.S. did
to Libya, Syria and Iraq.
Not only must the U.S. pressure its
Arab allies of the Persian Gulf to continue the flow of funds and weapons to
the Sunni extremist groups, but it must also pressure Saudi Arabia to escalate
its disputes with Iran. And it must continue its double standard with Israel.
The
U.S. must help Israel to develop its nuclear arsenal with
up to 300 warheads while simultaneously pressuring others in the same region to
give up peaceful use of nuclear energy and technology. This is a good double
standard policy that those stupid Arab countries did not see or chose to be
blinded.
As
American diplomats Ryan Crocker, William Luers and Thomas Pickering stated in an op-ed on
July 11 in the Washington Post, a U.S.-Iran
nuclear deal can also save Iraq by tempering its meddling there. But, there can
be no cooperation from Iran if the economic sanctions against it are not lifted
in a reasonable manner after a nuclear agreement has been reached.
If the U.S. is truly would like to
accelerate the instability and bloodshed in the Middle East, it should continue
to play the double standard, lying and contradictions in its policy toward the
region.