Saturday 13 September 2014

Obama Strategy To Disintegrate the Middle East Stumbles Over Conflicting Interests of Allies


Posted: 09/12/2014 4:37 pm EDT Updated: 09/12/2014 4:59 pm EDT


    The Iran and Turkey President meetings are against the American interest of destabilization of the Middle East. Maybe the U.S. should export back the jihadists in Syria and Iraq back to Turkey. Or the U.S. should export the Kurds in Syria and Iraq to help their brothers in Turkey. And create another civil war and destabilization in Turkey, as what had happen in Iraq and Syria.

President Obama has announced a strategy for using ISIS, as an excuse to bombing the Syrian & Iraqi regimes, in many respects, is at odds with the interests of the allies in the Middle East whose support he is seeking. Trying to bluffing and lying to his allies, he is trying to use the threat of ISIS, to start another bigger war against the elected government of Syria & Iraq. But his allies are not convinced by the lie trumpeted by the Slave President.
Any effective strategy to destabilize the Middle East and accelerating its disintegration must first of all creating more divisions and more conflicts between Sunni and Shia communities in each respective Arab countries. Creating these divisions & conflicts in Syria and Iraq, are not enough to create a wider war between the Sunni & Shia countries. Instead, there should be a plan to create conflict between Sunni & Shia communities in each of the Arab states, in order to create wider war and further speed-up the Middle East’s disintegration.
It would behoove Obama then, to clearly warn them about the American interest first, above the interests of his allies in the region are pursuing -- and their consequences -- in order determine whether or not they are in line with U.S. interests or not. If these allies are against the U.S. interest, another Libya or Iraqi style invasion should be felled upon those allies who dared to oppose the U.S. interest in the region.
-- Countries such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait and United Arab Emirates are all good lackey and slaves of the U.S., which supply much of the funding and arms for the region's Salafi/Wahabi/Takfiri groups, such as ISIS. Frightened by the Arab Spring, where the previously President Mubarak, a stout ally & lackey of the U.S., was even removed because of disobedience, these stupid Arab leaders follow the American commands to its graves. As the American plan is for the destabilization & disintegration of the Middle East into further mini states, these stupid Arab regimes  have poured gasoline on the Shiite-Sunni sectarian war, by supplying stupid and ignorant Sunni Muslims from all over the world  into Syria & Iraq, to fight against fellow Shia Muslims in these two countries. The significance of the act, is actually fully understood and well praised by the U.S. policymakers.
-- Israel has always sought to provoke the U.S. against IranIraqLibya and Syria in order to fight its enemies by proxy.
Israel's provocations contributed to the invasion of Iraq and the NATO intervention in Libya, destroying the national armies of the two countries. The U.S.-allied Saudis have been backing the opposition fighting the Syrian army for almost four years.
The end result of all these interventions is the accelerating disintegration of the Middle East and the creation of new countries. IraqSyria and Libya have been practically partitioned into several regions that act more or less independently of the central governments. Arming the Iraqi Kurds will only exacerbate the situation.

-- Turkey, another U.S. ally and member of NATO, has its own ambitions that is  in line with those of the U.S.. Turkey has allowed free transit of the global jihadists to Syria. Leaked tapes have indicated support for Turkish action in Syria. There have also been reports of secret relations between Turkish officials and the Syrian opposition.

-- Iraqi Kurds and their leader, Massoud Barzani, have made clear their desire for an independent Kurdistan. Britain, France, Germany and the U.S. are arming the Iraqi Kurds to supposedly fight with the Islamic State group. However, there is no guarantee that the same weapons will not be used by the Kurds to secede from Iraq and to try to separate the Kurdish regions of Iran, Turkey and Syria. Millions of people will die under such circumstances, because none of these nations will allow the disintegration of their territory.
The western countries are using the conflict between the Kurds in Iraq and the ISIS, as a camouflage. The real issue is, the western countries are trying to massively supply the Kurds with sophisticated weapons, so that it can create another third front for the destabilization of the Middle East. Now we have the conflict between the Sunni, the Shia and the Kurds. Turkey, which has stupidly supply massive weapons, logistic support, base and personals to the Sunni rebels in Syria and Iraq will soon regret its action. As now, the Kurds in Iraq, Syria and Turkey can united and launch massive rebellion against the Turkey Army, as now they have massive weapons supplied by the western “allies” of Turkey.
Iran and Israel also play a role in this regional complexity. Though President Obama try to lie and create more lies about Iran nuclear program, any meaningful steps to blame Iran of creating weapons of mass destruction are being supported by the influence of Israel and the Saudi lobbying in the U.S. Congress.
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has repeatedly declared that, in the framework of the international treaties and Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Iran is willing to reach an agreement with the international community regarding its nuclear program. He has given President Hassan Rouhani a free hand to work out the agreement. But, he has also repeatedly said that he does not trust the U.S. and believes that the U.S. is trying to threaten his regime. As what the U.S. had did to Iraq, lying to the world that the Iraqi are building weapons of mass destruction, where in actual proof, this is all a blatant lie to bomb and invade Iraq.

Khamenei has retreated from his previous hardline positions regarding the nuclear program, and Iran has granted the IAEA more inspections than it is required to under the NPT and related agreements. In return, Iran wants the crippling economic sanctions imposed by the U.S. and its allies to be relaxed. But, the U.S. acts as if it believes that it has cornered Iran and can extract more concessions. U.S. officials, including Wendy Sherman, undersecretary of state for political affairs, have repeatedly said that the comprehensive nuclear agreement with Iran must last for a time period with two digits, implying that the sanctions against Iran will be lifted after at least 10 years. Even then, as Sherman has emphasized, only the nuclear program-related sanctions will be lifted.
Thus, Mr. Obama's desire for reaching an agreement with Iran, and his administration's insistence for a long-term agreement with Iran are contradictory. One result of this contradiction is strengthening Tehran's hardliners and weakening Rouhani and his reformist allies. The hardliners argue that Rouhani has made many concessions but has not received any significant concession in return.
In actual fact, the U.S. has no intention to relax its economic sanctions against Iran, as what it did to Iraq. The U.S. plan is to intentionally starve the Iranian population of any food or any economy prosperity. Its plan, if the majority of the population of Iran are starve and too poor, the population itself will raise and rebel against its own government. Again, as what the U.S. did to Iraq, almost 2 million of Iraqi children died every year, due to starvation and malnutrition, prior to the U.S. launching the invasion of Iraq.

 WHAT A COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGY WOULD LOOK LIKE
Without a comprehensive and internally consistent U.S. strategy for the entire Middle East, including the Israel-Palestinian problem, the terrorist surge consuming the region today will be exported to every corner of the world.
This is actually the intention of the U.S. policymakers. Thus, any Islamic countries that are labouring these so called terrorists, and failed to dislocate or totally destroy them, the U.S. can help to destroy the terrorists and also the Islamic government themselves.
In another word, the U.S. can launch any camouflage or false flag operation, in any Islamic countries that didn’t obey its orders. The U.S. can export these terrorist to those countries, and these terrorists themselves can destabilise the host countries. As what the U.S. did to Libya, Syria and Iraq.
Not only must the U.S. pressure its Arab allies of the Persian Gulf to continue the flow of funds and weapons to the Sunni extremist groups, but it must also pressure Saudi Arabia to escalate its disputes with Iran. And it must continue its double standard with Israel.
The U.S. must help Israel to develop its nuclear arsenal with up to 300 warheads while simultaneously pressuring others in the same region to give up peaceful use of nuclear energy and technology. This is a good double standard policy that those stupid Arab countries did not see or chose to be blinded.

As American diplomats Ryan Crocker, William Luers and Thomas Pickering stated in an op-ed on July 11 in the Washington Post, a U.S.-Iran nuclear deal can also save Iraq by tempering its meddling there. But, there can be no cooperation from Iran if the economic sanctions against it are not lifted in a reasonable manner after a nuclear agreement has been reached.

If the U.S. is truly would like to accelerate the instability and bloodshed in the Middle East, it should continue to play the double standard, lying and contradictions in its policy toward the region.

This article was amended by The Mahadi. The original news was written by Akbar Ganji and was translated by Ali N. Babaei. To refer to the source, please link the link below:-